← All compliance guides·Industry Guides
👔Critical Risk

AI Compliance for HR and Hiring

The most-regulated AI use case in the US: NYC, Colorado, Illinois, EU

Hiring and employment AI is subject to more explicit, enacted regulation than any other AI use case in the United States. NYC LL144 is in active enforcement with $1,500/day fines. Colorado and Illinois have disclosure requirements. The EU AI Act classifies hiring AI as high-risk globally.

Applicable regulations

NYC Local Law 144

Critical Risk

Scope: Employers using automated employment decision tools for NYC jobs

Annual independent bias audit, publish audit summary on website, notify candidates of AI use 10 days before assessment

Deadline: In force July 2023 ($1,500/day per violation)

EU AI Act — High-Risk Hiring AI

Critical Risk

Scope: AI used in recruitment, selection, promotion in EU

Conformity assessment, technical documentation, bias testing, human oversight — all before deploying to EU candidates

Deadline: August 2, 2026

Colorado SB 24-205

High Risk

Scope: Employers using AI employment decision tools in Colorado

Disclose AI use to candidates and employees, provide opportunity to correct factual errors, annual impact assessments

Deadline: June 30, 2026

Illinois AI Video Interview Act (AIVIA)

High Risk

Scope: Employers using AI to analyze video interviews in Illinois

Disclose AI use before interview, get written or electronic consent, explain what characteristics AI evaluates, do not share video without consent

Deadline: In force 2020, amended 2024

EEOC — Title VII Guidance on AI

High Risk

Scope: All US employers

AI hiring tools with disparate impact on protected classes may violate Title VII. Employer responsibility for vendor AI. Request bias audit results from vendors.

Deadline: Ongoing

GDPR Article 22 — Automated Hiring Decisions

High Risk

Scope: EU candidates subject to AI-only hiring decisions

Right to human review of automated decisions, right to explanation of factors, right to contest decision

Deadline: Ongoing

What to do first

1

NYC LL144: immediately check if you have NYC-based employees or candidates — if yes, you need a bias audit now

2

All US hiring AI: test for disparate impact across race, gender, age, disability before deployment

3

EU candidates: ensure human review is part of every AI-assisted hiring decision

4

Illinois AIVIA: add consent language to any video interview process using AI analysis

5

Colorado (June 2026): prepare candidate disclosure and AI impact assessment documentation

6

Get audit results from your AI hiring vendors — you are responsible for their tool's bias under EEOC guidance

Estimated compliance cost

$15,000–$60,000 initial (NYC audit: $10,000–$30,000) + $10,000–$25,000/year

Proactive compliance typically costs 3–5× less than post-enforcement remediation.

Generate your hr and hiring AI compliance plan

ComplianceIQ maps your specific AI systems against all applicable regulations for hr and hiring — and generates prioritized documentation across 108+ jurisdictions.

Get HR and Hiring compliance plan

Further reading

Other industry guides